Snowden (2016)

I did not see 2015’s Citzenfour documentary about Edward Snowden. Had I, I might not have appreciated Oliver Stone’s (Platoon, Born on the Fourth of July) biopic as much as I did. I think part of the reason I was such a big fan of Snowden was that I knew very little about it before my viewing. Sure I knew of Wikileaks and learned a lot from the news, but I didn’t pay. Snowden went from your everyday no name to one of the most controversial figures of this century. Now, if you think this movie will be completely neutral, you don’t know Oliver Stone very well. Heck, this was the same man who directed JFK. His approach has always been very anti-government, and with Snowden, it’s no different. While I haven’t loved all of his movies (Nixon, W., Alexander, Savages, even JFK wasn’t really my thing), there are certainly more than I do like. Platoon and Born on the Fourth of July are incredibly amazing, while other movies such as Natural Born Killers and Wall Street were revolutionary. Snowden might be my third favorite. Snowden was definitely softer in tone and, maybe even the scope, but was, by no means, less controversial. I don’t have a lot of complaints about the movie itself. Some people said it was too long. I did not feel that way. My only problem with it is that it didn’t make Ed Snowden as controversial as he was. Instead, it made it seem that whistleblowing on his country was the right and noble thing to do. For some, maybe most, it may have been. But what we weren’t really shown was the “other side” of the story. Nonetheless, it was an enjoyable film that gave a great backstory for why he did the things he did.

Every day good guy Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays the title role, and we see him in a way we’ve never seen before. His voice is completely recognizable, even though he appeared in every scene. He was by no means the same jovial guy we’ve grown accustomed to seeing. In Snowden, we see him as a character with the blandest personality of all of the characters we’ve seen him play. But he still is JGL, and he’s an actor who we’ve grown used to seeing as the good guy. So for the story that Stone was trying to portray, he picked a guy we could root for.

If Edward Snowden hadn’t been a real-life character, this movie still could have been made by Stone. Stone tends to create films based on once patriotic characters who become embittered with the country after learning its fraud and deception. He did in Platoon. He did it in Born on the Fourth of July. He did it in Heaven & Earth. He did it in JFK. He even did it in a movie like Natural Born KillersSnowden was his wheelhouse from the start and, for his take on the story, he did a really great job.

By definition, a whistleblower is a person who exposes any information or activity that is deemed illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organization that is either private or public. The information on alleged wrongdoing can be classified in many ways: violation of company policy/rules, law, regulation, or threat to public interest/national security, as well as fraud and corruption. So why wouldn’t we want to have more of those people? Don’t we want the companies we are paying money to and the organizations we are supporting to do legal and ethical things? I certainly do. I remember when I was a cashier at Safeway. A fairly decent percentage of the other checkers who worked the late afternoon/evening shifts were letting their friends come in and basically pay hundreds of dollars worth of stuff for pennies on the dollar either by abusing the instore coupon system or simply not scanning items and instead just putting them in a bag. It bothered me immensely. If they were doing it so often and blatantly, I worried who else at that store or who else in the division or else at other grocery stores was doing the same thing. We all know that theft is one of the things that cause the prices at stores to rise. While I thought it was completely wrong, I was just a 19-year-old college kid who worked at the store during the summer and on holiday breaks. I certainly wasn’t going to say anything. However, when I went back to college that fall, I learned that many of these employees had been caught and subsequently fired from their jobs.

While I wanted to tell management, if nothing else through an anonymous note, to pay closer attention to some of these employees, I didn’t. I didn’t think it was my place, and I was scared. I can’t imagine what Edward Snowden was thinking when he decided to blow the whistle on the National Security Agency (NSA) in 2013 by releasing thousands of classified documents without authorization to a trio of journalists working for The Guardian. The story begins and ends with flashbacks, which helps tie together loose ends. The movie is mostly told through flashbacks, though, which can be outstanding. When a movie director doesn’t, it can be a disaster. Fortunately, Stone was the former throughout the storytelling of this movie.

Snowden had one desire in life. And that was to serve his country as a member of the United States Army. So when he was medically discharged due to a degenerative issue with his legs, he decided to use his mind to help defend the country he loved. First, hired by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and later the NSA, he learned more and more about computer networks, hacking, and, most importantly, protecting confidential information. And the more he excelled at his job, the more he was needed and the more he was filled in on how our country operated post-911. Because of his position and his level of skill, he learned more in a quick period of time about United States intelligence than 99.999% of Americans will ever know. Being just a geek with good intentions, Snowden was surprised to know the level of surveillance that these organizations were conducting both domestically and abroad. He believed, naively like many of us, that the United States government was following its own laws and not conducting illegal searches and seizures. Little did he know about The Patriot Act (signed into law by then-President George W. Bush in 2001) that allowed the US to provide appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism as a result of the acts on 9/11. Basically, it gave the US Government the freedom to do whatever it wanted to do and protect itself behind this act.

As a result, Snowden saw many things he didn’t want to see, including killing innocent lives of foreigners who were even remotely connected to those threatening national defense. Now to think that other countries aren’t doing the same thing or wouldn’t be doing the same thing if they had the same level of resources is absolutely absurd. Nonetheless, where is the line drawn between what we can do and what we should be allowed to do. Capable that with the fact that we were connecting thought to be terrorists with their contacts and sooner than you can say, “Hey wait for a second,” half the planet is being watched illegally. Long story short, this didn’t sit well with Snowden. He agonized over it, and it weighed on his conscience until it got to the point where he had to do something about it.

Shailene Woodley (The Descendants, The Spectacular Now) has long ago since arrived. Already carrying a moneymaking franchise (Divergent), she’s not quite Jennifer Lawrence, but she’s not as far behind as people think. While she wasn’t perfectly cast for this film (just as Nicolas Cage, Tom Wilkinson, Melissa Leo, and Timothy Olyphant were either), Lindsay Mills’ relationship with Edward was important. This carefree liberal he quickly fell in love with and had some tumultuous times while living in different parts of the world was one of the main reasons he ultimately leaked his information. Finally, a guilty conscience could weigh on him no longer. He thought of the NSA’s actions on innocent people worldwide and, though he knew he’d be labeled a traitor by many, it was worth it to him for the world to know what illegal activities were being conducted.

Again, this is just Stone’s take on the story. In his version of the story, Snowden comes across as a very sympathetic character who risked his life to do what he thought was the right thing to do. And, as mentioned earlier, Gordon-Levitt (who everyone likes) was the right man to play the lead. I was glad to see on Rotten Tomatoes that this movie was listed as a drama and biopic. There were moments where I couldn’t tell if we were supposed to have suspense in some of the scenes, but if we were, they definitely weren’t there. This was a gentler and more personable Stone film…one we really haven’t seen from this accomplished actor before. I appreciated the detail and the development of characters who had to make tough decisions and how some were deeply affected by what they did or didn’t do and some who weren’t affected at all.

The film’s not for everyone. If you know the story and deemed Snowden a traitor, you’ll probably be angered by it. However, I was deeply impressed by how involved I became with it. I was worried it might be dry or that it would be so over my head that I wouldn’t like it. Neither of those happened. It made me want to go back and learn more about the infamous WikiLeaks of 2013. It was worth my $12 to see it in the theater. It might be for you as well.

Plot 7.5/10 (an important story to be told despite the well-received documentary Citizenfour, which had just been released a year before…this was just one take on the story…and it was a very anti-government approach that focused on the lead character’s actions and the way that the director chose to tell his story…a story that was controversial but always made it seem like Snowden was doing the right thing)
Character Development 9/10
Character Chemistry 9/10 (I’ve seen quite a few critiques kind of bash the relationship aspect between Edward and Lindsay wasn’t need it and that it took away from the story and made it longer…I don’t see it this way…I thought it was integral to the storytelling and was needed, among other things, to help justify his decision)
Acting 9/10 (As much as I just said Lindsay was needed in the storytelling, the talented Woodley was a little overmatched by Gordon-Levitt here…and many other well-known actors (lesser characters could have played Wilkinson, Leo, Cage, Olyphant…Gordon-Levitt could have done this with a bunch of C-listers.
Screenplay 7.5/10 (again…it was just way too one-sided for me…if you don’t know his story at all, you’d call Snowden a hero after this movie…if you did know the whole story in all its details, you might be more likely to call him a traitor…I really, really liked the movie, but it wasn’t a full representation of everything that could have been shown, in my opinion)
Directing 10/10 (never dull…and it could have been in the wrong hands…so props to Stone)
Cinematography 8.5/10
Sound 8.5/10
Hook and Reel 10/10 (I was into it the entire time…it never felt like it was too long)
Universal Relevance 10/10
89%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.